How to perform operations on very big torch tensors without splitting them

user_10849727 0
Viewed 100

My Task:

I'm trying to calculate the pair-wise distance between every two samples in two big tensors (for k-Nearest-Neighbours), That is - given tensor test with shape (b1,c,h,w) and tensor train with shape (b2,c,h,w), I need || test[i]-train[j] || for every i,j. (where both test[i] and train[j] have shape (c,h,w), as those are sampes in the batch).

The Problem

both train and test are very big, so I can't fit them into RAM

My current solution

For a start, I did not construct these tensors in one go - As I build them, I split the data Tensor and save them separately to memory, so I end up with files {Test\test_1,...,Test\test_n} and {Train\train_1,...,Train\train_m}. Then, I load in a nested for loop every Test\test_i and Train\train_j, calculate the current distance, and save it.

This semi-pseudo-code might explain

test_files = [f'Test\test_{i}' for i in range(n)]
train_files = [f'Train\train_{j}' for j in range(m)]
dist = lambda t1,t2: torch.cdist(t1.flatten(1), t2.flatten(1)) 
all_distances = []
for test_i in test_files:
    test_i = torch.load(test_i) # shape (c,h,w)
    dist_of_i_from_all_j = torch.Tensor([])
    for train_j in train_files:
        train_j = torch.load(train_j) # shape (c,h,w)
        dist_of_i_from_all_j = torch.cat((dist_of_i_from_all_j, dist(test_i,train_j))
    all_distances.append(dist_of_i_from_all_j)
# and now I can take the k-smallest from all_distances

What I thought might work

I came across FAISS repository, in which they explain that this process can be sped up (maybe?) using their solutions, though I'm not quite sure how. Regardless, any approach would help!

faiss knn torch nearest-neighbor python
2 Answers

Did you check the FAISS documentation?

If what you need is the L2 norm (torch.cidst uses p=2 as default parameter) then it is quite straightforward. Code below is an adaptation of the FAISS docs to your example:

import faiss
import numpy as np
d = 64                           # dimension
nb = 100000                      # database size
nq = 10000                       # nb of queries
np.random.seed(1234)             # make reproducible
x_test = np.random.random((nb, d)).astype('float32')
x_test[:, 0] += np.arange(nb) / 1000.
x_train = np.random.random((nq, d)).astype('float32')
x_train[:, 0] += np.arange(nq) / 1000.

index = faiss.IndexFlatL2(d)   # build the index
print(index.is_trained)
index.add(x_test)                  # add vectors to the index
print(index.ntotal)

k= 100 # take the 100 closest neighbors
D, I = index.search(x_train, k)     # actual search
print(I[:5])                   # neighbors of the 100 first queries
print(I[-5:])                  # neighbors of the 100 last queries
user_32847130

Consequently, I chose to implement some version of the Earth-Movers-Distance, as was suggested in the following ai.StackExchange post. Let me summarize the approach:

Given the task as described in "My Task" above, I defined

def cumsum_3d(test, train):
    for i in [-1, -2, -3]:
        test = torch.cumsum(test, i)
        train = torch.cumsum(train, i)
    return test, train

then, given the tensors test and train:

test,train = cumsum_3d(test,train)
dist = torch.cdist(test.flatten(1),train.flatten(1))

For future viewers - bare in mind that:

  • I did not use FAISS because it does not support windows currently, but most importantly it does not support (as far as I know of) this version of EMD or any other version of multidimensional (=shape (c,h,w) like in my example) tensors distance. To account for the RAM problem I've used Google Colab and sliced my data to more files
  • This implementation was only relevant as I was dealing with shallow activation layers. If I were to use the last layer (avgpool) as my activations, It would have been fine not using the EMD, as the output right after the avgpool has shape (512,)
user_108497270
Related