Is there a more efficient way to obtain variance of lot's of columns than dplyr?

user_8496446 0
Viewed 104

I have a data.frame that is >250,000 columns and 200 rows, so around 50 million individual values. I am trying to get a breakdown of the variance of the columns in order to select the columns with the most variance.

I am using dplyr as follows:

df %>% summarise_if(is.numeric, var)

It has been running on my imac with 16gb of RAM for about 8 hours now.

Is there a way top allocate more resources to the call, or a more efficient way to summarise the variance across columns?

summarize dplyr tidyverse r
3 Answers

I bet that selecting the columns first, then calculating the variance, will be a lot faster:

df <- as.data.frame(matrix(runif(5e7), nrow = 200, ncol = 250000))

df_subset <- df[,sapply(df, is.numeric)]
sapply(df_subset, var)

The code above runs on my machine in about a second, and that's calculating the variance on every single column because they're all numeric in my example.

user_78354350

Very wide data.frames are quite inefficient. I think converting to a matrix and using matrixStats::colVars() would be the fastest.

user_153444420

You may try using data.table which is usually faster.

library(data.table)

cols <- names(Filter(is.numeric, df))
setDT(df)
df[, lapply(.SD, var), .SDcols = cols]

Another approach you can try is getting the data in long format.

library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)

df %>%
  select(where(is.numeric)) %>%
  pivot_longer(cols = everything()) %>%
  group_by(name) %>%
  summarise(var_value = var(value))

but I agree with @Daniel V that it is worth checking the data as 8 hours is way too much time to perform this calculation.

user_39629140
Related