In C, there are many posts concerning using fgetc after fscanf, dealing with an additional \n, but I am seeing another issue when using them in the reverse order; fscanf after fgetc.
When using fscanf after fgetc, I get a different fscanf-result to if I just omit fgetc (in the example script, just hard-coding num=1000 and commenting-out the block using fgetc).
I can replicate this correct fscanf-result while still using fgetc if I rewrite the file contents to the myFile variable, as in the below script. Removing this line produces the different incorrect fscanf-result.
What is causing the difference in the fscanf-result when using fgetc first, and how can I address the issue?
/* First read tab-delimited 4-digit int data from a text file,
* parsing into an array of the correct size num, then compute
* the mean of the array while avoiding overflow. */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(){
FILE *myFile;
myFile = fopen("int_values.txt", "r");
int c=0, i=0;
float mean = 0.0;
// Identifying there are 1000 values in the tab-delimited file.
// Using fgetc
int num = 1;
while ((c=fgetc(myFile)) != EOF ){
if (c == '\t')
++num;
}
int arr[num]; // Array of correct size for all values from file.
// Redeclaring since fgetc seems to break fscanf
myFile = fopen("int_values.txt", "r");
// Read and store each value from file to array.
for (i=0; i<num; i++){
fscanf(myFile, "%d ", &arr[i]);
}
// Compute average cumulatively to avoid overflow.
mean = arr[0]
for (i=1; i<num; i++){
//printf("In the %dth place, arr has value %d.\n", i, arr[i]);
mean *= (float)i / (float)(i+1);
mean += arr[i] / (float)(i+1);
}
fclose(myFile);
printf("The overall mean of the %d values in the file is %f.\n\n", num, mean);
return 0;
}