When deploying a Springboot maven project(version 2.3.4.RELEASE) to an external Tomcat container,official guide says you need to mark the "spring-boot-starter-tomcat" dependency as provided ,but actually even if without doing that,the final war package which contains lib like "spring-boot-starter-tomcat","tomcat-embed-core" and "tomcat-embed-websocket" also works fine in tomcat8.5.54 or tomcat 9.0 ,so I am confused about that,"Do we really need set spring-boot-starter-tomcat as provided or not?" ,anyone could explains why? "Traditional Deployment"
1 Answers
You don't want to have multiple versions of the same classes on the classpath. This can lead to many errors during runtime. For example, if you have a
public class MyServlet implements javax.servlet.Servlet
and you package both MyServlet.class and javax.servlet-api.jar (which contains javax.servlet.Servlet) into your application, you might get an error:
Servlet class MyServlet is not a javax.servlet.Servlet
What happens is: when the application classloader loads MyServlet, it looks for javax.servlet.Servlet in the application first and it finds it in javax.servlet-api.jar. The server compares this class with the one loaded by the server's classloader and concludes that they differ, since classes from different JARs are not equal. If the application is shipped without javax.servlet-api.jar this does not happen: the classloader does not find javax.servlet.Servlet in its own classpath, so it looks in the parent classloader.
Remark: This example can not actually be reproduced on Tomcat. Due probably to many incorrectly packaged applications the WebappClassLoader has an exception to the class loading rule: special classes such as those starting with javax.servlet or org.apache.tomcat are always loaded from the server's classloader (cf. the source code for a list of these exceptions).
TL;DR: due to the remark above, leaving spring-boot-starter-tomcat in the compile scope probably will do no harm, but it is a risk not worth taking.
Related