'in' for two sorted lists with the lowest complexity

You can iterate over your b list manually within a loop over a. You'll want to advance the b iteration when the latest value you've seen from it is less than the current value from a.

from math import inf

result = []
b_iter = iter(b)                           # create an iterator over b
b_val = -inf
for a_val in a:
    while b_val < a_val:
        b_val = next(b_iter, inf)          # manually iterate on it
    result.append(a_val == b_val)

This should have a running time of O(M+N), since each list item gets iterated over at most once (b may not even need to be fully iterated).

You could avoid using floating point infinities if you want to, but you'd need to do a bit of extra work to handle some edge cases (e.g. if b is empty).

Exploiting sorted'ness is a red-herring for time complexity: The ideal case is to iterate both in lockstep for O(n+m) complexity. This is the same as converting b to a set for O(m), then searching the elements of a in the set for O(n).

>>> a = [1, 4, 7, 8]
>>> b = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
>>> bs = set(b)                 # create set for O(len(b))
>>> [item in bs for item in a]  # check O(len(a)) items "in set of b" for O(1) each
[True, True, False, False]

Since most of these operations are builtin, the only costly operation is the iteration over a which is needed in all solutions.

However, this will duplicate the references to the items in b. If b is treated as external to the algorithm, the space complexity is O(m+n) instead of the ideal case O(n) for just the answer.

Late answer, but a different approach to the problem using set() uniqueness and O(1) speed of len(), i. e. :

a_in_b = []
a = [1,4,7,8]
b = [1,2,3,4,5,6]
b_set = set(b) 
for v in a:
    l1 = len(b_set) 
    b_set.add(v) 
    a_in_b.append(l1 == len(b_set)) 

Unfortunately, my approach isn't the fastest:

• mistermiyagi: 0.387 ms
• tomerikoo: 0.442 ms
• blckknght: 0.729 ms
• lobito: 1.043 ms
• semisecure: 1.87 ms
• notnotparas: too long
• lucky6qi: too long

Benchmark

Use Binary Search here:

def bs(b,aele,start,end):
    if start > end:
        return False
    mid = (start + end) // 2
    if ale == b[mid]:
        return True

    if ale < b[mid]:
        return bs(b, aele, start, mid-1)
    else:
        return bs(b, aele, mid+1, end)

For each element in a check if it exists in b using this method. Time Complexity: O(m*log(n))

Using sets the order doesn't even matter.

Turn b to a set (O(N)). Then iterate a (O(M)), and for each element check if it's in set_b (O(1)). This will give a time complexity of O(max(M, N)):

a = [1, 4, 7, 8]
b = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

set_b = set(b)
res = []
for elem in a:
    res.append(elem in set_b)

This can of-course be shortened to a nifty list-comp:

res = [elem in set_b for elem in a]

Both give:

[True, True, False, False]

For your parenthesized request, simply iterate with enumerate instead:

for i, elem in enumerate(a):
    if elem in set_b:
        res.append(i)

Which will give [0, 1].

The obvious solution is actually O(M + N):

a = [1, 1, 4, 7, 8]
b = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
c = [0] * len(a) # Or use a dict to stash hits ..

j = 0

for i in range(0, len(a)):
  while j < len(b) - 1 and b[j] < a[i]:
    j += 1
  if b[j] == a[i]:
    c[i] = 1

print(c)

For each i in 0 ... N where N is length of a, only a unique partition / sub-sequence of b plus one border number is checked, making it O(M + N) all together.

Go through a and b once:

a_in_b = []
bstart = 0
for ai in a:
    print (ai,bstart)
    if bstart == len(b):
        a_in_b.append(False)
    else:
        for bi in b[bstart:]:
            print (ai, bi, bstart)
            if ai == bi:
                a_in_b.append(True)
                break
            elif ai > bi:
                if bstart < len(b):
                    bstart+=1
                if bstart == len(b):
                    a_in_b.append(False)
                continue

You should use binary search algorithm(read about it if you don't know what it is).

The modified bin_search function has to return position right for which b[right] >= elem - the first element in b that is greater or equal than searched element from a. This position will be used as the left position for next bin_search call. Also bin_search returns True as a second argument if it have found elem in b

def bin_search(arr, elem, left):
    right = len(arr)
    while left < right:
        mid = (left+right)//2
        if arr[mid] == elem:
            return (mid, True)
        if arr[mid] < elem:
            left = mid + 1
        else:
            right = mid
    return (right, False)

def find_a_in_b(a, b):
    new_left = 0
    a_in_b = [False] * len(a)
    
    # we could have used enumerate but size of a is too large
    index = 0
    for i in a:
        new_left, a_in_b[index] = bin_search(b, i, new_left)
        index += 1
    return a_in_b

It's probably the best time

P.S. Forget it, i'm stupid and forgot about linear algorithm used in merge sort, so it's not the best

for el in a:
    try:
        b = b[b.index(el):]
        a_in_b.append("True")
    except:
        a_in_b.append("False")

A simple solution is to convert the lists to a data frame and do an inner merge

The inner join matches like values on a specific column