What is the correct way of interpreting the effect of two interaction terms in lmer?

Viewed 1120

I am interested in examining the effect of time on the levels of antibodies and how that relationship in influenced by the interaction of gender and age. This is how I have built my model. I have included a random intercept for repeated measures.

model <- lmer(Antibody ~  Time + (Sex*Age)+ (1|PID), data=metadata)

This is the result

Linear mixed model fit by maximum likelihood . t-tests use Satterthwaite's method ['lmerModLmerTest']
Formula: Antibody ~ Time + (Sex * Age) + (1 | PID)
   Data: metadata

     AIC      BIC   logLik deviance df.resid 
   441.0    461.3   -213.5    427.0      128 

Scaled residuals: 
     Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max 
-2.14160 -0.28264 -0.01453  0.26966  2.27572 

Random effects:
 Groups   Name        Variance Std.Dev.
 PID      (Intercept) 1.8039   1.343   
 Residual             0.3003   0.548   
Number of obs: 135, groups:  PID, 95

Fixed effects:
                                                   Estimate Std. Error         df t value Pr(>|t|)    
(Intercept)                                        6.717567   0.263584 134.327633  25.485  < 2e-16 ***
Time                                              -0.013952   0.002131  54.645901  -6.547 2.13e-08 ***
Sex                                                0.740442   0.299279  92.341423   2.474   0.0152 *  
Age                                               -0.101281   0.227621  92.276736  -0.445   0.6574    
Sex.Male:Age                                       0.655921   0.307147  91.570395   2.136   0.0354 * 

How can I interpret this output? Does the significant interaction between males and age mean that older males have higher antibodies for longer? If not how should I formulate the model to test for the impact of the interaction of age and sex on the duration of the antibody?

Thanks in advance

0 Answers
Related