I am having trouble distinguishing between a sidecar and an init container. So far, I understand that the real app containers wait for init container to do something. However, sidecar could do the same thing , could it not? And vice versa, init containers don't die off, so also run "on the side". Hence , my confusion.
Thanks for the help.
Init-containers are used to initialize something inside your Pod. The init-containers will run and exit. After every init container which exits with a code 0, your main containers will start.
Examples for init-containers are:
Kubernetes itself does not know anything about sidecars. Sidecar-Containers are a pattern to solve some use-cases. Usually, Kubernetes distinguishes between Init-Containers and Containers running inside your Pod.
Typically, we call Sidecars all containers, that do not provide a user-focused service. For example, this could be a proxy or something for easier database access. If you're running a Java-App you could use a sidecar to export JVM metrics in Prometheus format.
The difference here is, that your sidecar-containers must run all the time. If one of your not-init-containers exits, kubernetes will restart the whole pod.
And that's the difference.
