eslint complaining about resolving paths

Viewed 514

I keep receiving the eslint error import/no-unresolved and am unsure as to how I fix it. I know this is related to babel, but I’m not sure how to get babel and eslint to play nice.

My babel.config.js file:

module.exports = {
  presets: [['@babel/preset-env', { targets: { node: 'current' } }], '@babel/preset-react'],
  plugins: [
    'babel-plugin-macros',
    '@babel/plugin-syntax-dynamic-import',
    '@babel/plugin-transform-destructuring',
    [
      '@babel/plugin-proposal-class-properties',
      {
        loose: true,
      },
    ],
    [
      '@babel/plugin-proposal-object-rest-spread',
      {
        useBuiltIns: true,
      },
    ],
    [
      '@babel/plugin-transform-runtime',
      {
        helpers: false,
        regenerator: true,
      },
    ],
    [
      '@babel/plugin-transform-regenerator',
      {
        async: false,
      },
    ],
  ],
};

… and my .eslintrc.js file

module.exports = {
  parser: 'babel-eslint',
  extends: 'airbnb',
  env: {
    browser: true,
    node: true,
    jest: true,
    es6: true,
  },
  plugins: ['react', 'jsx-a11y'],
  parserOptions: {
    ecmaVersion: 6,
    sourceType: 'module',
    ecmaFeatures: {
      jsx: true,
    },
  },
  rules: {
    'object-curly-spacing': 2,
    'arrow-parens': ['error', 'as-needed'],
    'arrow-body-style': [2, 'as-needed'],
    'comma-dangle': [2, 'always-multiline'],
    'import/imports-first': 0,
    'import/newline-after-import': 0,
    'import/no-dynamic-require': 0,
    'import/no-extraneous-dependencies': 0,
    'import/no-named-as-default': 0,
    'import/no-unresolved': 2,
    'import/prefer-default-export': 0,
    indent: [
      2,
      2,
      {
        SwitchCase: 1,
      },
    ],
    'space-before-function-paren': 0,
    'jsx-a11y/aria-props': 2,
    'jsx-a11y/heading-has-content': 0,
    'jsx-a11y/label-has-associated-control': 2,
    'jsx-a11y/mouse-events-have-key-events': 2,
    'jsx-a11y/no-autofocus': 0,
    'jsx-a11y/role-has-required-aria-props': 2,
    'jsx-a11y/role-supports-aria-props': 2,
    'max-len': 0,
    'newline-per-chained-call': 0,
    'no-confusing-arrow': 0,
    'no-console': 1,
    'no-use-before-define': 0,
    'prefer-template': 2,
    'class-methods-use-this': 0,
    'react/forbid-prop-types': 0,
    'react/jsx-first-prop-new-line': [2, 'multiline'],
    'react/jsx-filename-extension': 0,
    'react/prefer-stateless-function': 0,
    'react/jsx-no-target-blank': 0,
    'react/require-extension': 0,
    'react/prop-types': 0,
    'react/self-closing-comp': 0,
    'require-yield': 0,
    'import/no-webpack-loader-syntax': 0,
    semi: ['error', 'always'],
  },
  settings: {
    'import/resolver': {
      webpack: {
        config: 'config/webpack/development.js',
      },
    },
  },
};

The issue occurs for every type of import: screenshot of eslint errors

Any suggestions?

EDIT

I’ve created a repository using the same eslint setup as I’m using in this project. It’s showing the same error I’m seeing.

https://github.com/brandondurham/eslint-test

1 Answers

You'll have to at the very least update your eslint config to say you want ES2018 (or newer) support, since you're validating modern JS with module imports:

module.exports = {
  ...
  parserOptions: {
    ecmaVersion: 2018,
    sourceType: 'module',
    ecmaFeatures: {
      jsx: true,
    },
  },
  ...
};

Because from https://eslint.org/docs/user-guide/configuring#specifying-parser-options we know that ecmaVersion: 6 corresponds to asking ESLint to validate your code as ES2015, which predates ES modules, and so will correctly flag any import ... from "..." statement as an error.

I tried your github repo with a heavily reduced ESlint config:

module.exports = {
  parser: 'babel-eslint',
  extends: 'airbnb',
  env: {
    browser: true,
    node: true,
    jest: true,
    es6: true
  },
  plugins: ['react'],
  parserOptions: {
    ecmaVersion: 2018,
    sourceType: 'module',
    ecmaFeatures: {
      jsx: true,
    },
  },
  rules: {
    'no-unused-vars': 0
  }
};

And that works just fine, so: start building it back up until it breaks, so you have a better idea of what really needs addressing.

Related