Why there is a need for dedicated syntax (:=, the Walrus operator) for named expressions in Python?

user_3261450 0
Viewed 162

I genuinely do not understand why there was a need to introduce a dedicated syntax (the := operator) for named expressions, described in PEP572. E.g. one is supposed to write:

if (match := pattern.search(data)) is not None:
    # Do something with match

why not simply if (match = pattern.search(data))? If it is because of backward compatibility, then note that the following expression: (x = 1) raises SyntaxError: invalid syntax, thus it would be enough to allow for it and start interpreting it as a named expression, instead of introducing the new := operator, which btw will in probably most cases be surrounded by parentheses anyway.

I feel like I don't see something obvious that everyone else gets ;-)

python-3.x python
1 Answers

It’s because explicit is better than implicit, and := makes your intentions of performing assignment clear; whereas using = could easily be the result of a typo, which is the reason why = intentionally does not work in an expression in Python.

In fact, accidentally using = instead of == inside a comparison is a frequent source of error in languages that support it.

user_19680
Related