I am working to transform my dataframe into an array of fixed-sized segments that I should feed to a convolutional neural net. Specifically, I would like to transfrom the df to list of m arrays each containing segments sized (1,5,4). So at last, I would have an (m,1,5,4) array.
To clarify my question, I explain using this MWE. Suppose this is my df:
df = {
'id': [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1],
'speed': [17.63,17.63,0.17,1.41,0.61,0.32,0.18,0.43,0.30,0.46,0.75,0.37],
'acc': [0.00,-0.09,1.24,-0.80,-0.29,-0.14,0.25,-0.13,0.16,0.29,-0.38,0.27],
'jerk': [0.00,0.01,-2.04,0.51,0.15,0.39,-0.38,0.29,0.13,-0.67,0.65,0.52],
'bearing': [29.03,56.12,18.49,11.85,36.75,27.52,81.08,51.06,19.85,10.76,14.51,24.27],
'label' : [3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3] }
df = pd.DataFrame.from_dict(df)
To do this, I use this function:
def df_transformer(dataframe, chunk_size=5):
grouped = dataframe.groupby('id')
# initialize accumulators
X, y = np.zeros([0, 1, chunk_size, 4]), np.zeros([0,])
# loop over segments (id)
for _, group in grouped:
inputs = group.loc[:, 'speed':'bearing'].values
label = group.loc[:, 'label'].values[0]
# calculate number of splits
N = len(inputs) // chunk_size
if N > 0:
inputs = np.array_split(inputs, [chunk_size]*N)
else:
inputs = [inputs]
# loop over splits
for inpt in inputs:
inpt = np.pad(
inpt, [(0, chunk_size-len(inpt)),(0, 0)],
mode='constant')
# add each inputs split to accumulators
X = np.concatenate([X, inpt[np.newaxis, np.newaxis]], axis=0)
y = np.concatenate([y, label[np.newaxis]], axis=0)
return X, y
The df above has 12 rows, so if transformed correctly to the intended form, I should get an array of shape (3,1,5,4). In the above function, segments with less than 5-rows are zero-padded, to make segment shaped (1,5,4).
Currently, I have two problems with this function:
- The function works well for rows less than 10 only in my df.
Like so (last row should then be zero-padded in the following):
X , y = df_transformer(df[:9])
X
array([[[[ 1.763e+01, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 2.903e+01],
[ 1.763e+01, -9.000e-02, 1.000e-02, 5.612e+01],
[ 1.700e-01, 1.240e+00, -2.040e+00, 1.849e+01],
[ 1.410e+00, -8.000e-01, 5.100e-01, 1.185e+01],
[ 6.100e-01, -2.900e-01, 1.500e-01, 3.675e+01]]],
[[[ 3.200e-01, -1.400e-01, 3.900e-01, 2.752e+01],
[ 1.800e-01, 2.500e-01, -3.800e-01, 8.108e+01],
[ 4.300e-01, -1.300e-01, 2.900e-01, 5.106e+01],
[ 3.000e-01, 1.600e-01, 1.300e-01, 1.985e+01],
[ 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00]]]])
But introduces an all-zero array (segment) in this case:
X , y = df_transformer(df[:10])
X
array([[[[ 1.763e+01, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 2.903e+01],
[ 1.763e+01, -9.000e-02, 1.000e-02, 5.612e+01],
[ 1.700e-01, 1.240e+00, -2.040e+00, 1.849e+01],
[ 1.410e+00, -8.000e-01, 5.100e-01, 1.185e+01],
[ 6.100e-01, -2.900e-01, 1.500e-01, 3.675e+01]]],
[[[ 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00],
[ 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00],
[ 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00],
[ 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00],
[ 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00]]],
[[[ 3.200e-01, -1.400e-01, 3.900e-01, 2.752e+01],
[ 1.800e-01, 2.500e-01, -3.800e-01, 8.108e+01],
[ 4.300e-01, -1.300e-01, 2.900e-01, 5.106e+01],
[ 3.000e-01, 1.600e-01, 1.300e-01, 1.985e+01],
[ 4.600e-01, 2.900e-01, -6.700e-01, 1.076e+01]]]])
- The function fails if I pass a whole
df(I don't understand the error but it seems to be related to the padding of segments less than 5 rows).
So in the case, I get index can't contain negative values error:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ValueError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-5-1fc559db37eb> in <module>()
----> 1 X , y = df_transformer(df)
2 frames
<ipython-input-4-9e1c49985863> in df_transformer(dataframe, chunk_size)
24 inpt = np.pad(
25 inpt, [(0, chunk_size-len(inpt)),(0, 0)],
---> 26 mode='constant')
27 # add each inputs split to accumulators
28 X = np.concatenate([X, inpt[np.newaxis, np.newaxis]], axis=0)
<__array_function__ internals> in pad(*args, **kwargs)
/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/numpy/lib/arraypad.py in pad(array, pad_width, mode, **kwargs)
746
747 # Broadcast to shape (array.ndim, 2)
--> 748 pad_width = _as_pairs(pad_width, array.ndim, as_index=True)
749
750 if callable(mode):
/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/numpy/lib/arraypad.py in _as_pairs(x, ndim, as_index)
517
518 if as_index and x.min() < 0:
--> 519 raise ValueError("index can't contain negative values")
520
521 # Converting the array with `tolist` seems to improve performance
ValueError: index can't contain negative values
Expected output:
X , y = df_transformer(df)
X
array([[[[ 1.763e+01, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 2.903e+01],
[ 1.763e+01, -9.000e-02, 1.000e-02, 5.612e+01],
[ 1.700e-01, 1.240e+00, -2.040e+00, 1.849e+01],
[ 1.410e+00, -8.000e-01, 5.100e-01, 1.185e+01],
[ 6.100e-01, -2.900e-01, 1.500e-01, 3.675e+01]]],
[[[ 3.200e-01, -1.400e-01, 3.900e-01, 2.752e+01],
[ 1.800e-01, 2.500e-01, -3.800e-01, 8.108e+01],
[ 4.300e-01, -1.300e-01, 2.900e-01, 5.106e+01],
[ 3.000e-01, 1.600e-01, 1.300e-01, 1.985e+01],
[ 4.600e-01, 2.900e-01, -6.700e-01, 1.076e+01]]],
[[[ 7.500e-01, -3.800e-01, 6.500e-01, 1.451e+01],
[ 3.700e-01, 2.700e-01, 5.200e-01, 2.427e+01],
[ 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00],
[ 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00],
[ 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00, 0.000e+00]]]])
Can someone help me fix this? The WME above works fine to reproduce this bug.
EDIT
The answer by RichieV also has a bug. Although it works in the given MWE it doesn't do the right task in the case below (extending the dftwice
its size):
df = {
'id': [1]*12+[2]*12,
'speed': [17.63,17.63,0.17,1.41,0.61,0.32,0.18,0.43,0.30,0.46,0.75,0.37]*2,
'acc': [0.00,-0.09,1.24,-0.80,-0.29,-0.14,0.25,-0.13,0.16,0.29,-0.38,0.27]*2,
'jerk': [0.00,0.01,-2.04,0.51,0.15,0.39,-0.38,0.29,0.13,-0.67,0.65,0.52]*2,
'bearing': [29.03,56.12,18.49,11.85,36.75,27.52,81.08,51.06,19.85,10.76,14.51,24.27]*2,
'label' : [3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3]*2 }
df = pd.DataFrame.from_dict(df)
X, y = df_transformer(df, chunk_size=5)
print(X[:3])
[[[[ 1.763e+01 0.000e+00 0.000e+00 2.903e+01]
[ 0.000e+00 0.000e+00 0.000e+00 0.000e+00]
[ 0.000e+00 0.000e+00 0.000e+00 0.000e+00]
[ 0.000e+00 0.000e+00 0.000e+00 0.000e+00]
[ 3.700e-01 2.700e-01 5.200e-01 2.427e+01]]]
[[[ 7.500e-01 -3.800e-01 6.500e-01 1.451e+01]
[ 3.000e-01 1.600e-01 1.300e-01 1.985e+01]
[ 4.600e-01 2.900e-01 -6.700e-01 1.076e+01]
[ 1.800e-01 2.500e-01 -3.800e-01 8.108e+01]
[ 3.200e-01 -1.400e-01 3.900e-01 2.752e+01]]]
[[[ 6.100e-01 -2.900e-01 1.500e-01 3.675e+01]
[ 1.410e+00 -8.000e-01 5.100e-01 1.185e+01]
[ 1.700e-01 1.240e+00 -2.040e+00 1.849e+01]
[ 1.763e+01 -9.000e-02 1.000e-02 5.612e+01]
[ 4.300e-01 -1.300e-01 2.900e-01 5.106e+01]]]]
Notice the first element isn't the same as in the answer (got an all-zero in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th rows.