Newer GCC introduced a new builtin __integer_pack to help it implement std::make_integer_sequence and friends. For Reasons(tm), I am unable to use this function, so I'm trying to reimplement it (and then use #define to replace the standard library usage)
It's used in the form __integer_pack(N)..., which expands its "return value". However I can't convince the type of my own templates to match this, with clang (10) erroring with:
error: pack expansion does not contain any unexpanded parameter packs
using make_integer_sequence = integer_sequence<_Tp, integer_pack(_Num)...>;
Is this even possible?
Here's what I've got so far:
#include <cstddef>
template <std::size_t...> struct index_sequence {};
template <std::size_t N, std::size_t... Is>
struct integer_pack : integer_pack<N - 1, N - 1, Is...> {};
template <std::size_t... Is>
struct integer_pack<0u, Is...> : index_sequence<Is...> { using type = index_sequence<Is...>; };
// Assume nothing below here can be changed.
#include <iostream>
/// Class template integer_sequence
template<typename _Tp, _Tp... _Idx>
struct integer_sequence
{
typedef _Tp value_type;
static constexpr size_t size() noexcept { return sizeof...(_Idx); }
};
// debugging aid
template<typename T, T... ints>
void print_sequence(integer_sequence<T, ints...> int_seq)
{
std::cout << "The sequence of size " << int_seq.size() << ": ";
((std::cout << ints << ' '),...);
std::cout << '\n';
}
template<typename _Tp, _Tp _Num>
using make_integer_sequence = integer_sequence<_Tp, integer_pack(_Num)...>;
int main()
{
print_sequence(make_integer_sequence<int, 20>{});
}