Why I can still get the value from vectors[0] even I already pop_back() at the first step?
I'm guessing now my vectors is empty and check it by calling empty()
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
struct Vector2 {
int x, y;
Vector2(int _x, int _y)
: x(_x)
, y(_y) {}
Vector2(const Vector2& vec)
: x(vec.x)
, y(vec.y) {
std::cout << "[Copy] Vector2{" << x << "," << y << "} copied!"
<< std::endl;
}
void Print() {
std::cout << "[Print] Vector2{" << x << "," << y << "}" << std::endl;
}
};
void PrintVectors(const std::vector<Vector2>& vectors) {
std::cout << "---" << std::endl;
for (auto& vector : vectors) {
std::cout << "Vector2{" << vector.x << "," << vector.y << "}"
<< std::endl;
}
}
int main() {
std::vector<Vector2> vectors;
vectors.push_back({21, 78});
PrintVectors(vectors);
// First
vectors.pop_back();
if (vectors.empty()) {
std::cout << "Empty condition!" << std::endl;
}
vectors[0].Print(); // ---> I thought I'd get an error at this point.
vectors.insert(vectors.begin(), {vectors[0].x + 1, vectors[0].y});
PrintVectors(vectors);
// Second
vectors.pop_back();
vectors[0].Print();
vectors.insert(vectors.begin(), {vectors[0].x + 1, vectors[0].y});
PrintVectors(vectors);
// Third + no pop_back needed
vectors[0].Print();
vectors.insert(vectors.begin(), {vectors[0].x + 1, vectors[0].y});
PrintVectors(vectors);
// 4th
vectors.pop_back();
vectors[0].Print();
vectors.insert(vectors.begin(), {vectors[0].x + 1, vectors[0].y});
PrintVectors(vectors);
}
Then, this condition let me debugging through gdb. I see the value of _M_ is changing, but I have no clue what's going on (I can't see the pattern or relation between _M_start and _M_finish).