If you want performance consider the following options
julia> using DataFrames
julia> using Statistics
julia> using BenchmarkTools
julia> data = DataFrame(Value = rand(1:10, 10^6),
Type = categorical(rand(["A", "B"], 10^6)));
Note that I generate :Type column as categorical, as this will be much faster to aggregate later.
First a timing from the answer above:
julia> @benchmark by($data, [:Type], df -> mean(df[:, :Value]))
BenchmarkTools.Trial:
memory estimate: 30.53 MiB
allocs estimate: 212
--------------
minimum time: 12.173 ms (0.00% GC)
median time: 13.305 ms (3.63% GC)
mean time: 14.229 ms (4.30% GC)
maximum time: 20.491 ms (2.98% GC)
--------------
samples: 352
evals/sample: 1
Here is a timing where I change df[:, :Value] to df.Value. The difference is that df.Value does not copy data unnecessarily. You can see that already you save over 10% of run time:
julia> @benchmark by($data, :Type, df -> mean(df.Value))
BenchmarkTools.Trial:
memory estimate: 22.90 MiB
allocs estimate: 203
--------------
minimum time: 10.926 ms (0.00% GC)
median time: 13.151 ms (1.92% GC)
mean time: 13.093 ms (3.53% GC)
maximum time: 16.933 ms (3.25% GC)
--------------
samples: 382
evals/sample: 1
And here is an efficient way to write it. This statement means that we pass column :Value to a function mean:
julia> @benchmark by($data, :Type, :Value => mean)
BenchmarkTools.Trial:
memory estimate: 15.27 MiB
allocs estimate: 190
--------------
minimum time: 8.326 ms (0.00% GC)
median time: 8.667 ms (0.00% GC)
mean time: 9.599 ms (2.74% GC)
maximum time: 17.364 ms (3.57% GC)
--------------
samples: 521
evals/sample: 1
To finalize let us just check the difference if :Value is a Vector{String} (the approach that is given in the other answer):
julia> data.Type = String.(data.Type);
julia> @benchmark by($data, [:Type], df -> mean(df[:, :Value]))
BenchmarkTools.Trial:
memory estimate: 46.16 MiB
allocs estimate: 197
--------------
minimum time: 26.664 ms (2.08% GC)
median time: 27.197 ms (2.11% GC)
mean time: 27.486 ms (2.11% GC)
maximum time: 35.740 ms (1.64% GC)
--------------
samples: 182
evals/sample: 1
And you can see that it is around three times slower than the recommended answer. Also note that:
julia> by(data, :Type, :Value => mean)
2×2 DataFrame
│ Row │ Type │ Value_mean │
│ │ String │ Float64 │
├─────┼────────┼────────────┤
│ 1 │ B │ 5.50175 │
│ 2 │ A │ 5.49524 │
produces a nicer default name for the generated column (as it knows the source column name and the transformation function name).