Two approaches for you:
- With your
Call type as an overloaded function type
- With just an overloaded function.
With your Call type
The type you'd want for Call is an overloaded function type. You can define it like this:
type Call = {
(...args: ['add', number, number]): Promise<number>;
(...args: ['log', string]): Promise<void>;
};
Since you need to associate a return type with the parameter list, the Actions type doesn't really help.
A function typed with that type will do the inference you've asked for:
function doSomething(fn: Call) {
fn('add', 1, 2)
.then(value => {
// Here, TypeScript infers `value` is of type `number`
});
fn('log', 'message')
.then(value => {
// Here, TypeScript infers `avlue` is of type `void`
});
}
On the playground
If you're going to write functions for that, it may help to have some helper types:
type AddParams = ['add', number, number];
type LogParams = ['log', string];
type ActionParams =
| AddParams
| LogParams;
type Call = {
(...args: AddParams): Promise<number>;
(...args: LogParams): Promise<void>;
};
Then for instance:
const call: Call = (...args: ActionParams): Promise<any> => {
// (Dummy implementation)
if (args[0] === 'add') {
return Promise.resolve(args[1] + args[2]);
}
return Promise.resolve();
};
On the playground
With just an overloaded function
If you just want to write an overloaded function, you don't need the Call type (you probably know that):
type AddAction = ['add', number, number];
type LogAction = ['log', string];
type Actions =
| AddAction
| LogAction;
function call(...args: AddAction): Promise<number>;
function call(...args: LogAction): Promise<void>;
function call(...args: Actions): Promise<any> {
// ...implementation...
}
call('add', 1, 2)
.then(value => {
// Here, TypeScript infers `value` is of type `number`
});
call('log', 'message')
.then(value => {
// Here, TypeScript infers `avlue` is of type `void`
});
On the playground