A good solution would be to avoid using the traditional Email/Password approach to authentication and go with what another answer here suggested of OTP or One-Time-Password.
Consider the user experience: typing an email and password on a mobile device is cumbersome and annoying and awkward. Then they have to remember their password as well? The average person in the Western world probably uses 10 to 15 apps per day and we want to tax their human memory banks for another password to awkwardly type onto their phone while they are on a packed subway train?
Although it's deceptively challenging to put together, consider One Time Password. With it, a user enters in a phone number as an identifying token.
In theory, every single user has their own unique phone number and thats easy for a user to remember. Since your user is on their Android device, makes sense so far, right? And no awkward typing of email and password.
After they enter their phone number, we then text them a code to the mobile device, which is a 4 to 6 digit number. The user enters that code in the application, thereby proving they are the owner of the device that the phone number is tied into.
The benefit of OTP over Email/Password is that it requires very little memory on the users part. And yes, it's even better than OAuth because what if the user never signed in to a Gmail account or Github account via their mobile browser? Then they are back to Email/Password awkward style authentication for mobile device.
One-Time password is user friendly.
But you say okay, but is it secure and more importantly to the question: How can I have my server side code match the hashed users password I am sending it?
Right, so One Time Password technology is always an ambitious project to undertake IMO.
So we need to persist the code that the user should be entering into the device so we can compare it at some point in the future. When you generate a code, save it to Firebase so at some point in the future you can reach back out to Firebase and say the user with phone number 212-555-1212 just sent you the code 1234, is that the correct code?
So, the way Firebase works with OTP is you can store the code in Firebase. The challenge though is actually texting the user a code. This is an actual SMS message. To handle that, you can't use Firebase alone, you can integrate the extremely popular Twilio. Twilio is all about interacting with users via phone SMS messages and so we can make use of Twilio to text the user a code.
You can also take care of authentication or user system inside of Firebase. Once the user enters an OTP, we generate the JSON Web Token through Firebase.
So all the JSON storage and all the info that reflects who the user is, all that can be saved on Firebase.
But there is another part to that question I have not answered:
How do I go about securing my users passwords so that the server side
can Identify/authenticate each user?
Okay, so you need to compare the code on some server. It can't be Firebase because Firebase is simply a datastore, it is a place to store JSON data, it does not give us ability to run custom code.
So do you write a server for the comparison of codes? We do NOT want to do this comparison on the user's device.
So what do we do? Also, how do we generate a code? Don't use the user's device for that either.
So where do we generate the code? We know to use Firebase data storage to store the code, but how do we generate it?
That's a good job for Google Cloud Functions.
So Google Cloud Functions are code snippets that run one time on demand on Google servers. GCF have tight inter-operability and integration with Firebase data stores.
We can add some logic or processing to the data sitting inside of Firebase. GCF will allow you some custom logic to generate your codes and save them to Firebase and GCF can also compare the code once the user sends it in.
AWS Lambda and GCF are nearly identical in functionality so that could be an option as well.