Blocks nested too deeply

Viewed 10108

I have some untypical problem. I make available to the user sendText() function. He can type e.g.

sendText( "mytext{newline}text{up}" )

{text} is a special key that user is allowed to send. There are a lot of special keys available.

So my first step was to get the string between {} brackets and to create:

if( _specialKey == "newline" ) {
    // action for VK_RETURN
} else if( _specialKey == "up" ) {
    // action for VK_UP
} else .....

example:

if( specialKey == "n" ) {
    // enter click
    unsigned short key = VK_RETURN;
    inputs.push_back( keyDown( key ) );
    inputs.push_back( keyUp( key ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "n+" ) {
    // enter down
    inputs.push_back( keyDown( VK_RETURN ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "n-" ) {
    // enter up
    inputs.push_back( keyUp( VK_RETURN ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "t" ) {
    // tabulator click
    unsigned short key = VK_TAB;
    inputs.push_back( keyDown( key ) );
    inputs.push_back( keyUp( key ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "t+" ) {
    // tabulator down
    inputs.push_back( keyDown( VK_TAB ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "t-" ) {
    // tabulator up
    inputs.push_back( keyUp( VK_TAB ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "caps" ) {
    // caps lock click
    unsigned short key = VK_CAPITAL;
    inputs.push_back( keyDown( key ) );
    inputs.push_back( keyUp( key ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "caps+" ) {
    // caps lock down
    inputs.push_back( keyDown( VK_CAPITAL ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "caps-" ) {
    // caps lock up
    inputs.push_back( keyUp( VK_CAPITAL ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "ralt" ) {
    // right alt click
    unsigned short key = VK_RMENU;
    inputs.push_back( keyDown( key ) );
    inputs.push_back( keyUp( key ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "ralt+" ) {
    // right alt down
    inputs.push_back( keyDown( VK_RMENU ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "ralt-" ) {
    // right alt up
    inputs.push_back( keyUp( VK_RMENU ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "lalt" ) {
    // right alt click
    unsigned short key = VK_LMENU;
    inputs.push_back( keyDown( key ) );
    inputs.push_back( keyUp( key ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "lalt+" ) {
    // right alt down
    inputs.push_back( keyDown( VK_LMENU ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "lalt-" ) {
    // right alt up
    inputs.push_back( keyUp( VK_LMENU ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "rctrl" ) {
    // right alt click
    unsigned short key = VK_RCONTROL;
    inputs.push_back( keyDown( key ) );
    inputs.push_back( keyUp( key ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "rctrl+" ) {
    // right alt down
    inputs.push_back( keyDown( VK_RCONTROL ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "rctrl-" ) {
    // right alt up
    inputs.push_back( keyUp( VK_RCONTROL ) );

    return 2;
} else if( specialKey == "lctrl" ) {

but the compiler said:

fatal error C1061: compiler limit : blocks nested too deeply

My first idea to solve it was to define a map that will store all special keys (as a string) that maps to some integer. Then I could do:

switch( map[key] ) {
    case 0:
    ...
}

but I'm not sure if the compiler won't complain about it too. There's a lot of to change, so I don't want to change it for no results.

Or maybe do you have some other better ideas?

Thanks.

3 Answers
Related