Is XAMPP (for Windows) preferred over WampServer? If so, why?

Viewed 31260

It seems lots of answers to questions about getting started in web development include "install XAMPP", even when the platform is Windows. Meanwhile, WampServer doesn't seem to be mentioned often. I've used both XAMPP and WampServer (admittedly, WampServer much more) and think they are both fine. So, is XAMPP preferred? If it is, why?

I realize that Perl comes with XAMPP, but this bias seems to exist even when PHP is the only programming language in question.

This question seems related, but the answers don't really get to the core of why XAMPP seems preferred over WAMP. (And is also a bit stale.)

Update (May 30, 2012): This article, points to more packages to try out. AMPSS was the author's choice for ease of use and extensibility. However, one of the more specialized BitNami stacks may be better for some situations. WampServer and XAMPP still got good marks.

4 Answers

I am using wamp server since long time. It's light weight and very easy to configure and do upgrades. Also If you need perl, you can simply install perl into wamp server. I also used xampp couple of times, but simply I don't like it. Also I heard it has some security vulnerabilities and need to reconfigure. Also it suggest to turn off UAC in windows (vista & seven). I think it wasn't good idea.

Related