The C `clock()` function just returns a zero

user_235472 0
Viewed 16236

The C clock() function just returns me a zero. I tried using different types, with no improvement... Is this a good way to measure time with good precision?

#include <time.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main()
{
    clock_t start, end;
    double cpu_time_used;

    char s[32];

    start = clock();

    printf("\nSleeping 3 seconds...\n\n");
    sleep(3);

    end = clock();

    cpu_time_used = ((double)(end - start)) / ((double)CLOCKS_PER_SEC);

    printf("start = %.20f\nend   = %.20f\n", start, end);
    printf("delta = %.20f\n", ((double) (end - start)));
    printf("cpu_time_used  = %.15f\n", cpu_time_used);
    printf("CLOCKS_PER_SEC = %i\n\n", CLOCKS_PER_SEC);

    return 0;
}

Sleeping 3 seconds...

start = 0.00000000000000000000
end   = 0.00000000000000000000
delta = 0.00000000000000000000
cpu_time_used  = 0.000000000000000
CLOCKS_PER_SEC = 1000000

Platform: Intel 32 bit, RedHat Linux, gcc 3.4.6

clock time c c++
6 Answers

clock() reports CPU time used. sleep() doesn't use any CPU time. So your result is probably exactly correct, just not what you want.

Fred_Larson_100770

man clock. It's not returning what you think it is. Also man gettimeofday - it's more likely what you want.

user_2237830

clock_t is an integer type. You can't print it out with %f. See Fred's answer for why the difference is 0.

Paul_Tomblin_33330 
 printf("start = %.20f\nend   = %.20f\n", start, end);

should be:

 printf("start = %d\nend   = %d\n", start, end);
Admin1

Calling sleep() isn't going to use up any CPU time. You should see a little difference, though. I corrected your printf type mismatch bug in this line:

printf("start = %.20f\nend   = %.20f\n", start, end);

And it gave reasonable results on my machine:

start = 1419
end   = 1485
delta = 66
cpu_time_used  = 0.000066000000000
CLOCKS_PER_SEC = 1000000

You might try gettimeofday() to get the real time spent running your program.

user_1169080
Related