I'm curious if O(n log n) is the best a linked list can do.
I'm curious if O(n log n) is the best a linked list can do.
This is a nice little paper on this topic. His empirical conclusion is that Treesort is best, followed by Quicksort and Mergesort. Sediment sort, bubble sort, selection sort perform very badly.
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LINKED LIST SORTING ALGORITHMS by Ching-Kuang Shene
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.31.9981
You can copy it into an array and then sort it.
Copying into array O(n),
sorting O(nlgn) (if you use a fast algorithm like merge sort ),
copying back to linked list O(n) if necessary,
so it is gonna be O(nlgn).
note that if you do not know the number of elements in the linked list you won't know the size of array. If you are coding in java you can use an Arraylist for example.
The question is LeetCode #148, and there are plenty of solutions offered in all major languages. Mine is as follows, but I'm wondering about the time complexity. In order to find the middle element, we traverse the complete list each time. First time n elements are iterated over, second time 2 * n/2 elements are iterated over, so on and so forth. It seems to be O(n^2) time.
def sort(linked_list: LinkedList[int]) -> LinkedList[int]:
# Return n // 2 element
def middle(head: LinkedList[int]) -> LinkedList[int]:
if not head or not head.next:
return head
slow = head
fast = head.next
while fast and fast.next:
slow = slow.next
fast = fast.next.next
return slow
def merge(head1: LinkedList[int], head2: LinkedList[int]) -> LinkedList[int]:
p1 = head1
p2 = head2
prev = head = None
while p1 and p2:
smaller = p1 if p1.val < p2.val else p2
if not head:
head = smaller
if prev:
prev.next = smaller
prev = smaller
if smaller == p1:
p1 = p1.next
else:
p2 = p2.next
if prev:
prev.next = p1 or p2
else:
head = p1 or p2
return head
def merge_sort(head: LinkedList[int]) -> LinkedList[int]:
if head and head.next:
mid = middle(head)
mid_next = mid.next
# Makes it easier to stop
mid.next = None
return merge(merge_sort(head), merge_sort(mid_next))
else:
return head
return merge_sort(linked_list)