How to provide user name and password when connecting to a network share

Viewed 339483

When connecting to a network share for which the current user (in my case, a network enabled service user) has no rights, name and password have to be provided.

I know how to do this with Win32 functions (the WNet* family from mpr.dll), but would like to do it with .Net (2.0) functionality.

What options are available?

Maybe some more information helps:

  • The use case is a windows service, not an Asp.Net application.
  • The service is running under an account which has no rights on the share.
  • The user account needed for the share is not known on the client side.
  • Client and server are not members of the same domain.
12 Answers

I liked Mark Brackett's answer so much that I did my own quick implementation. Here it is if anyone else needs it in a hurry:

public class NetworkConnection : IDisposable
{
    string _networkName;

    public NetworkConnection(string networkName, 
        NetworkCredential credentials)
    {
        _networkName = networkName;

        var netResource = new NetResource()
        {
            Scope = ResourceScope.GlobalNetwork,
            ResourceType = ResourceType.Disk,
            DisplayType = ResourceDisplaytype.Share,
            RemoteName = networkName
        };

        var userName = string.IsNullOrEmpty(credentials.Domain)
            ? credentials.UserName
            : string.Format(@"{0}\{1}", credentials.Domain, credentials.UserName);

        var result = WNetAddConnection2(
            netResource, 
            credentials.Password,
            userName,
            0);

        if (result != 0)
        {
            throw new Win32Exception(result);
        }   
    }

    ~NetworkConnection()
    {
        Dispose(false);
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
        Dispose(true);
        GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
    }

    protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        WNetCancelConnection2(_networkName, 0, true);
    }

    [DllImport("mpr.dll")]
    private static extern int WNetAddConnection2(NetResource netResource, 
        string password, string username, int flags);

    [DllImport("mpr.dll")]
    private static extern int WNetCancelConnection2(string name, int flags,
        bool force);
}

[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
public class NetResource
{
    public ResourceScope Scope;
    public ResourceType ResourceType;
    public ResourceDisplaytype DisplayType;
    public int Usage;
    public string LocalName;
    public string RemoteName;
    public string Comment;
    public string Provider;
}

public enum ResourceScope : int
{
    Connected = 1,
    GlobalNetwork,
    Remembered,
    Recent,
    Context
};

public enum ResourceType : int
{
    Any = 0,
    Disk = 1,
    Print = 2,
    Reserved = 8,
}

public enum ResourceDisplaytype : int
{
    Generic = 0x0,
    Domain = 0x01,
    Server = 0x02,
    Share = 0x03,
    File = 0x04,
    Group = 0x05,
    Network = 0x06,
    Root = 0x07,
    Shareadmin = 0x08,
    Directory = 0x09,
    Tree = 0x0a,
    Ndscontainer = 0x0b
}

You can either change the thread identity, or P/Invoke WNetAddConnection2. I prefer the latter, as I sometimes need to maintain multiple credentials for different locations. I wrap it into an IDisposable and call WNetCancelConnection2 to remove the creds afterwards (avoiding the multiple usernames error):

using (new NetworkConnection(@"\\server\read", readCredentials))
using (new NetworkConnection(@"\\server2\write", writeCredentials)) {
   File.Copy(@"\\server\read\file", @"\\server2\write\file");
}

One option that might work is using WindowsIdentity.Impersonate (and change the thread principal) to become the desired user, like so. Back to p/invoke, though, I'm afraid...

Another cheeky (and equally far from ideal) option might be to spawn a process to do the work... ProcessStartInfo accepts a .UserName, .Password and .Domain.

Finally - perhaps run the service in a dedicated account that has access? (removed as you have clarified that this isn't an option).

OK... I can resond..

Disclaimer: I just had an 18+ hour day (again).. I'm old and forgetfull.. I can't spell.. I have a short attention span so I better respond fast.. :-)

Question:

Is it possible to change the thread principal to an user with no account on the local machine?

Answer:

Yes, you can change a thread principal even if the credentials you are using are not defined locally or are outside the "forest".

I just ran into this problem when trying to connect to an SQL server with NTLM authentication from a service. This call uses the credentials associated with the process meaning that you need either a local account or a domain account to authenticate before you can impersonate. Blah, blah...

But...

Calling LogonUser(..) with the attribute of ????_NEW_CREDENTIALS will return a security token without trying to authenticate the credentials. Kewl.. Don't have to define the account within the "forest". Once you have the token you might have to call DuplicateToken() with the option to enable impersonation resulting in a new token. Now call SetThreadToken( NULL, token ); (It might be &token?).. A call to ImpersonateLoggedonUser( token ); might be required, but I don't think so. Look it up..

Do what you need to do..

Call RevertToSelf() if you called ImpersonateLoggedonUser() then SetThreadToken( NULL, NULL ); (I think... look it up), and then CloseHandle() on the created handles..

No promises but this worked for me... This is off the top of my head (like my hair) and I can't spell!!!

You should be looking at adding a like like this:

<identity impersonate="true" userName="domain\user" password="****" />

Into your web.config.

More Information.

This must be the stupidest way, but it's been useful to me lately and it's ridiculously simple.
Only works on Windows, of course.

Process.Start("CMDKEY", @"/add:""NetworkName"" /user:""Username"" /pass:""Password""");

Then you'll probably want to use WaitForExit() before trying to access the share.

You may remove the credentials at the end, using the CMDKEY command once more.

Related