Had a conversation with a coworker the other day about this.
There's the obvious using a constructor, but what are the other ways there?
Had a conversation with a coworker the other day about this.
There's the obvious using a constructor, but what are the other ways there?
There are various ways:
Class.newInstance.Constructor.newInstance.Object.clone (does not call a constructor).new for you.Strings)....) method call (no constructor for arrays).throw null; or "".toCharArray()[0].new keyword as well.Within the Java language, the only way to create an object is by calling its constructor, be it explicitly or implicitly. Using reflection results in a call to the constructor method, deserialization uses reflection to call the constructor, factory methods wrap the call to the constructor to abstract the actual construction and cloning is similarly a wrapped constructor call.
Yes, you can create objects using reflection. For example, String.class.newInstance() will give you a new empty String object.
Also you can use
Object myObj = Class.forName("your.cClass").newInstance();
This should be noticed if you are new to java, every object has inherited from Object
protected native Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException;
Also, you can de-serialize data into an object. This doesn't go through the class Constructor !
UPDATED : Thanks Tom for pointing that out in your comment ! And Michael also experimented.
It goes through the constructor of the most derived non-serializable superclass.
And when that class has no no-args constructor, a InvalidClassException is thrown upon de-serialization.
Please see Tom's answer for a complete treatment of all cases ;-)
is there any other way of creating an object without using "new" keyword in java
Reflection will also do the job for you.
SomeClass anObj = SomeClass.class.newInstance();
is another way to create a new instance of a class. In this case, you will also need to handle the exceptions that might get thrown.
You can also clone existing object (if it implements Cloneable).
Foo fooClone = fooOriginal.clone ();
From an API user perspective, another alternative to constructors are static factory methods (like BigInteger.valueOf()), though for the API author (and technically "for real") the objects are still created using a constructor.
Depends exactly what you mean by create but some other ones are:
there is also ClassLoader.loadClass(string) but this is not often used.
and if you want to be a total lawyer about it, arrays are technically objects because of an array's .length property. so initializing an array creates an object.