I am trying to enable user to go to a new Fragment when a list item is clicked. That's OK. I created an interface which allows me to handle click events from my FragmentA.java class. FragmentA is attached to my activity when activity started. my activity extends FragmentActivity.
In my activity class:
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInsantaceState){
//...
getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction().replace(R.id.container, FragmentA.newInstance(param1, param2)).commit();
}
And then in FragmentA.java, i set that to my RecyclerView Adapter as click handler. I use add() method instead of replace() method to change the fragment, because i want to save the FragmentA's state (like RecyclerView position etc.) when FragmentB is attached.
private void setListeners(){
mAdapter.setOnItemClickListener(itemClickListener);
}
private ItemListAdapter.ItemClickListener itemClickListener = new ItemListAdapter.ItemClickListener() {
@Override
public void onItemClicked(View v, ItemModel item) {
FragmentManager manager =((FragmentActivity)mActivity).getSupportFragmentManager();
manager.beginTransaction().add(R.id.post_activity_layout_container, FragmentB.newInstance(item, param2, param3)).addToBackStack("comment").commit();
}
};
HERE IS THE ISSUE : In this case, FragmentA is running but invisible, while user sees FragmentB. User can reach views of FragmentA, and that cause problems. I wanna save the last state of FragmentA but user should not click on views of FragmentA from FragmentB. How to handle that issue? Is there a better practice to accomplish saving the last state?
EDIT FragmentA contains some sorting, filtering. When i use replace() method, all filters that user set is invalidated, and also RecyclerView position became 0. Imagine that user is looking at (for example) 33. item in the list, clicks on it, FragmentB is attached, then go back to FragmentA. I want user to continue from 33. item, don't want user to try to find for where he was.