Backfill with --mark_success is slow

Viewed 198

I expect the behaviour of backfill with -m to run more or less instantaneous, as no work is done. However I am experiencing that the scheduler spends about 30 seconds on each task, which seems excessive.

I am running a small airflow instance in local_executor mode with Postgresql as DB.

Does this reflect your experience with Airflow backfill? Do you know about performance pitfalls or tricks to speed it up?

1 Answers
Related