Handler vs AsyncTask vs Thread

If we look at the source code, we will see AsyncTask and Handler is purely written in Java. (There are some exceptions, though. But that is not an important point)

So there is no magic in AsyncTask or Handler. These classes make our life easier as a developer.

For example: If Program A calls method A(), method A() could run in a different thread with Program A. We can easily verify by following code:

Thread t = Thread.currentThread();    
int id = t.getId();

Why should we use a new thread for some tasks? You can google for it. Many many reasons,e.g: lifting heavily, long-running works.

So, what are the differences between Thread, AsyncTask, and Handler?

AsyncTask and Handler are written in Java (internally they use a Thread), so everything we can do with Handler or AsyncTask, we can achieve using a Thread too.

What can Handler and AsyncTask really help?

The most obvious reason is communication between the caller thread and the worker thread. (Caller Thread: A thread which calls the Worker Thread to perform some tasks. A caller thread doesn't necessarily have to be the UI thread). Of course, we can communicate between two threads in other ways, but there are many disadvantages (and dangers) because of thread safety.

That is why we should use Handler and AsyncTask. These classes do most of the work for us, we only need to know which methods to override.

The difference between Handler and AsyncTask is: Use AsyncTask when Caller thread is a UI Thread. This is what android document says:

AsyncTask enables proper and easy use of the UI thread. This class allows to perform background operations and publish results on the UI thread without having to manipulate threads and/or handlers

I want to emphasize two points:

1) Easy use of the UI thread (so, use when caller thread is UI Thread).

2) No need to manipulate handlers. (means: You can use Handler instead of AsyncTask, but AsyncTask is an easier option).

There are many things in this post I haven't said yet, for example: what is UI Thread, or why it's easier. You must know some methods behind each class and use it, you will completely understand the reason why.

@: when you read the Android document, you will see:

Handler allows you to send and process Message and Runnable objects associated with a thread's MessageQueue

This description might seem strange at first. We only need to understand that each thread has each message queue (like a to-do list), and the thread will take each message and do it until the message queue is empty (just like we finish our work and go to bed). So, when Handler communicates, it just gives a message to caller thread and it will wait to process.

Complicated? Just remember that Handler can communicate with the caller thread safely.

It depends which one to chose is based on the requirement

Handler is mostly used to switch from other thread to main thread, Handler is attached to a looper on which it post its runnable task in queue. So If you are already in other thread and switch to main thread then you need handle instead of async task or other thread

If Handler created in other than main thread which is not a looper is will not give error as handle is created the thread, that thread need to be made a lopper

AsyncTask is used to execute code for few seconds which run on background thread and gives its result to main thread ** *AsyncTask Limitations 1. Async Task is not attached to life cycle of activity and it keeps run even if its activity destroyed whereas loader doesn't have this limitation 2. All Async Tasks share the same background thread for execution which also impact the app performance

Thread is used in app for background work also but it doesn't have any call back on main thread. If requirement suits some threads instead of one thread and which need to give task many times then thread pool executor is better option.Eg Requirement of Image loading from multiple url like glide.