I understand that the difference between the printf, fprintf, sprintf etc functions and the vprintf, vfprintf, vsprintf etc functions has to do with how they deal with the function arguments. But how specifically? Is there really any reason to use one over the other? Should I just always use printf as that is a more common thing to see in C, or is there a legitimate reason to pick vprintf instead?
what's the difference between the printf and vprintf function families, and when should I use one over the other?
Viewed 26493
4 Answers
The main difficulty with variadic arguments is not that there is a variable number of arguments but that there is no name associated with each argument. The va_start, va_arg macros parse the arguments in memory (in most C compilers they are on the stack) using the type information contained in the format string cf. Kernighan and Ritchie, second edition, section 7.3.
This example shows the elegance of Python. Since C/C++ cannot reconcile the difference between int error(char *fmt, ...) and int error(char *fmt, va_list ap), thus, for every function *printf, it has to create two versions, i.e., one taking in ..., the other taking in va_list, this essentially doubles the total number of functions. In Python, you can use *list() or **dict() to pass in a va_list as ....
Hopefully, future C/C++ can support this kind of argument processing scheme.
Related