This solution uses a RandomAccessFile to only cache the portion of the file subsequent to the string to remove. It scans until it finds the String you want to remove. Then it copies all of the data after the found string, then writes it over the found string, and everything after. Last, it truncates the file size to remove the excess data.
public static long scanForString(String text, File file) throws IOException {
if (text.isEmpty())
return file.exists() ? 0 : -1;
// First of all, get a byte array off of this string:
byte[] bytes = text.getBytes(/* StandardCharsets.your_charset */);
// Next, search the file for the byte array.
try (DataInputStream dis = new DataInputStream(new FileInputStream(file))) {
List<Integer> matches = new LinkedList<>();
for (long pos = 0; pos < file.length(); pos++) {
byte bite = dis.readByte();
for (int i = 0; i < matches.size(); i++) {
Integer m = matches.get(i);
if (bytes[m] != bite)
matches.remove(i--);
else if (++m == bytes.length)
return pos - m + 1;
else
matches.set(i, m);
}
if (bytes[0] == bite)
matches.add(1);
}
}
return -1;
}
public static void remove(String text, File file) throws IOException {
try (RandomAccessFile rafile = new RandomAccessFile(file, "rw");) {
long scanForString = scanForString(text, file);
if (scanForString == -1) {
System.out.println("String not found.");
return;
}
long remainderStartPos = scanForString + text.getBytes().length;
rafile.seek(remainderStartPos);
int remainderSize = (int) (rafile.length() - rafile.getFilePointer());
byte[] bytes = new byte[remainderSize];
rafile.read(bytes);
rafile.seek(scanForString);
rafile.write(bytes);
rafile.setLength(rafile.length() - (text.length()));
}
}
Usage:
File Contents: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Method Call: remove("ABC", new File("Drive:/Path/File.extension"));
Resulting Contents: DEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
This solution could easily be modified to remove with a certain, specifiable cacheSize, if memory is a concern. This would just involve iterating over the rest of the file to continually replace portions of size, cacheSize. Regardless, this solution is generally much better than caching an entire file in memory, or copying it to a temporary directory, etc.