differences between using wmode="transparent", "opaque", or "window" for an embedded object on a webpage

Viewed 161046

when embedding a Flash object with the <object> and <embed> tag, there is an attribute called wmode. It seems that most of the time, wmode="transparent" is the same as wmode="opaque" as the Flash doesn't actually have any transparent color so that the bottom HTML element is to be shown. As a result, opaque should be faster than transparent since it requires less processing for transparency, yet most of the time i see Flash object embedded with transparent instead of opaque.

opaque is needed so that other HTML element won't be covered up by the Flash object (such as a menu item that pops up an extra sub-menu won't be covered up by the Flash object).

By the way, is there formal documentation for wmode's opaque, transparent, and window? I was only able to find blogs that describe it but not the formal documentation. thanks.

5 Answers

Opaque will cause less system strain since 'transparent' will still attempt to apply alpha. The reason you see transparent used instead is because most web authors don't pay attention to detail (ie, just copy-pasted some embed code they found).

BTW, you are correct about it being undocumented. The best I've ever seen is a blog by a guy who claims to have talked to a Macromedia developer about it. Unfortunaetly I can't find the link.

EDIT: I think it was this one: http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?cid=e5141

Related