SQL grouping by all the columns

The DISTINCT Keyword

SELECT DISTINCT * FROM MyFooTable;

If you group by all columns, you are just requesting that duplicate data be removed.

For example a table with the following data:

 id |     value      
----+----------------
  1 | foo
  2 | bar
  1 | foo
  3 | something else

If you perform the following query which is essentially the same as SELECT * FROM MyFooTable GROUP BY * if you are assuming * means all columns:

SELECT * FROM MyFooTable GROUP BY id, value;

 id |     value      
----+----------------
  1 | foo
  3 | something else
  2 | bar

It removes all duplicate values, which essentially makes it semantically identical to using the DISTINCT keyword with the exception of the ordering of results. For example:

SELECT DISTINCT * FROM MyFooTable;

 id |     value      
----+----------------
  1 | foo
  2 | bar
  3 | something else

If you are using SqlServer the distinct keyword should work for you. (Not sure about other databases)

declare @t table (a int , b int)

insert into @t (a,b) select 1, 1
insert into @t (a,b) select 1, 2
insert into @t (a,b) select 1, 1

select distinct * from @t

results in

a b
1 1
1 2

nope. are you trying to do some aggregation? if so, you could do something like this to get what you need

;with a as
(
     select sum(IntField) as Total
     from Table
     group by CharField
)
select *, a.Total
from Table t
inner join a
on t.Field=a.Field

Short answer: no. GROUP BY clauses intrinsically require order to the way they arrange your results. A different order of field groupings would lead to different results.

Specifying a wildcard would leave the statement open to interpretation and unpredictable behaviour.

No because this fundamentally means that you will not be grouping anything. If you group by all columns (and have a properly defined table w/ a unique index) then SELECT * FROM table is essentially the same thing as SELECT * FROM table GROUP BY *.